Showing posts with label LIFE STYLE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LIFE STYLE. Show all posts

Saturday, 13 June 2015

4 ways sex may cure the common cold

4 ways sex may cure the common cold

Regular sex can help prevent you catching one of winter’s most universal ailments – the common cold. This is according to psychologists Carl Charnetski and Francis Brennan of Wilkes University, Pennsylvania, who claim that sexual activity boosts immunity.
According to their research, sex can lead to higher levels of Immunoglobulin A (IgA), which may offer some protection against disease.
This is however just one of the ways sex has been shown to ease the common cold; here are the others:
Touchy-feely: The sensation of touch during intimacy has been shown to have a positive impact on one’s emotional well-being. So, having an intimate moment with your lover will help you feel more upbeat, and fight off any aches and pains you may feel from being sick.
Better sleep: When you experience an orgasm, your body releases a hormone called oxytocin, also referred to as the “love hormone”, and this can make you quite sleepy. 
Painkiller: An article published in Cephalalgia, the journal of the International Headache Society, found that the endorphins released during orgasm can block pain, even the pain of a migraine. So if your congestion is resulting in a painful sinus headache, sex might be a viable option for curing it.

Tuesday, 9 June 2015

There's no time for hot, sweaty sex anymore

There's no time for hot, sweaty sex anymore

 
Hot sweaty sex is on the decline in South Africa and it’s not surprising. We live in a crazy country, we’re all stressed and it’s hard to find time to eat a sandwich let alone have a full on sizzling affair. 
Sometimes you just have to grab an hour or two when you can find it.  But even those hours have become tricky.
Dinner and sex? Always a great idea, even without the dinner. But as a single mom, I have to make sure the kids are definitely going to be at their dad. 
And not come home for a forgotten maths book.  Or just because they feel like coming home. It would be awkward to say the least if I was in an exciting clinch on the couch when my fifteen year old walked in. 
'Hi mom'. 
'Hey sweetie'. 
Two screams, resulting in death. 
And it isn’t just the kids. My dogs do not take kindly to men; any men. They bark like crazy and I gotta do everything I can to distract them. 
I spend a fortune on treats and bones but even so, when we go to the bedroom they just sit outside the door and cry. It’s not very sexy.
In fact, it’s just too hard having sex at my house so we have to have it at his. But then he also has kids so we can only do it when they’re at his ex wife. 
And I have to drive to him which means risking my life on the streets. Then parking my car in the street and chance it getting stolen. Plus the money I spend on anti-histamines; I’m hugely allergic to his cats.
It’s just not worth it. Also, I hate his cats.
A quickie mid-morning?  Ooh, great idea. No chance of kids coming home from school.  It’s quiet and the dogs are asleep from barking all night. But as your partner is about to de-robe you, the doorbell goes. 
First a broomseller.  Then a hungry homeless guy who just wants anything you can give, please Madam. Then the man with a long sob story about getting his pregnant wife to the hospital. 
Intimacy flies out the window.   
And then there are the sounds. I love putting on a bit of classical music although lately I’ve turned to rock and roll. I find it drowns out the neighbourhood alarms, police sirens and the odd gun shots.
None of which are a huge turn on.
Having sex in a hotel is too expensive, sex in the back of a car is only cool when you’re below a certain age and anyway, we have to worry about car guards, and movie theatres are just too damn uncomfortable.
Also, not so sexy when there are three other couples who have had the same idea and are panting in close proximity.
So how can we get inventive? Ask our neighbours to field the doorbell and unexpected visitors? Not my neighbours, they are too busy trying to have sex themselves. 
Move to another country? But then we’d be too stressed to even think about sex. Virtual sex, hmmmm, I think I could have hit on something here.

Would you date a guy whose best friend is a woman?


“Would you be OK with your man having close female friends?”
A Facebook friend asked this question the other day, and a lot of women said no, they wouldn’t be comfortable with this.
I know many men feel the same about their girlfriends or wives having close male friends. It’s a fairly typical attitude found in heterosexual couples.
I understand the feelings behind this. No one wants to have the worry that their significant other is going to cheat on them. If your boyfriend likes girls, and you’re the only girl he spends any significant time with, then that pretty much means he’s safely yours, right?
Well, no, not really.
I think that not only should we be OK with our partners having close friends who are the same gender as us, it’s something we should want. In other words, I prefer to date men who have close female friends.
See, when a man has close female friends as well as close male friends, it means a few things.
First, how sad must your relationship be if your trust in your significant other is so flimsy that you believe the only way to keep them from not cheating on you is to keep them away from anyone they might potentially find sexually attractive?
Think about it. If the only thing that’s stopping your boyfriend from cheating on you is he hasn’t been given the opportunity, then you’re in a pretty awful relationship that’s guaranteed to end badly.

The fact is, if your boyfriend is going to cheat on you, it’s going to happen sooner or later. I’d rather date a guy who’s trustworthy.

Of course, you might just think no guys at all can be trusted to be left alone with women without having sex with them, or that no single women can be trusted to be left alone with taken men without having sex with them. If that’s really how you see the world then I just kinda feel a little sorry for you.
Second, it means, or should mean if he’s not a hypocrite, that he will be comfortable with you having close male friends, and my friends are far too important for me to abandon or avoid some of them just because they’re male.
I know some people would say “my husband’s my best friend, so I don’t need anyone else!” Frankly I find that a little creepy.
I don’t know how these people function, but even though my fiancé is of course my best friend I still need my non-romantic, close friendships with people who are not family in my life.
Finally, it means he has women in his life who he values for their friendship alone, rather than for the amount of sex he can get out of them.
He views women as humans and equals - people he can talk to, trust, and rely on - rather than mere sex objects. This can only be a good thing. It means he will be able to see you as an equal that he can talk to, trust, and rely on.
If your boyfriend only values women he can have sex with, then how can you expect him to value you for anything other than sex?
And if your boyfriend is unused to having interactions with women that are not strictly romantic or sexual, how can you expect him to be able to understand and relate to you?
The fact is, one of the best ways to learn how to relate to others who are different to us is through friendships. When a person limits their friendships only to people who represent their gender, (or race, or sexual orientation, or anything else for that matter) they risk seeing anyone who doesn’t fit into that group as alien and “other”.
It’s easy to empathise with a friend, but it’s really hard to empathise with someone who is “other”.
That’s how you get these “men are from Mars and women are from Venus” situations, where women tell each other that all men are dogs, while men tell each other that “bitches be crazy”.
So I’m going to go ahead and say it: Not only should you be OK with dating a guy whose best friend is a woman, you should actively look at strong friendships with other women as a major bonus in a guy.
Follow Laura on Twitter and Facebook or visit her blog.

- Women24

Thursday, 28 May 2015

Are you exchanging sex for love?


"Be careful out there. There will be boys who try to mislead you with exaggerated notions of love when the majority is only interested in one thing."
My late father imparted that knowledge on me after he’d stumbled upon a love letter his ten-year-old daughter had written to her crush.
Naturally, I hadn’t the faintest idea what he was on about at the time, but for some reason, not once did I ever forget those words. And of course, with growth I came to realize their value.
Now, as a black woman in my mid-20s, I find myself being forced to relive his words as I try to find myself in a time of insatiable lust.
In a time where women are discarded for not relinquishing what is colloquially referred to as "the cookie"; 'small boys' with entitlement issues will lay on the guilt trip so thick that you end up being overly critical of yourself for not being "easy".
I’ve had to defend myself to guys who felt slighted that I dared starve them of my vagina when they could just as easily get it elsewhere, but opted for mine instead.
One even had the gall to accuse me of being petty! And as a young woman with traditional values (well, somewhat), it horrifies me to think that this is the quality of man that will raise our sons.
Not taking anything away from the decent men, I do believe that they still exist. And maybe I’m naïve for believing that love and lust can coexist in an era that’s bordering more towards the latter.
My belief, however, was almost shattered a few months ago when a dapper gentleman lost his cool and told me I was being irrational for not letting him penetrate me in the backseat of his car. I wasn’t going to let him have sex with me, period. We weren’t even exclusive.
Reflecting on it now, I suppose I should be grateful that he was cordial enough to take me back home instead of ditching me in a remote dump somewhere.
Things could’ve gone completely south – he could’ve chosen to violate me after realizing his courteous attempts failed dismally. In spite of this, a part of me anticipated an apologetic phone call the next day.
I convinced myself that once he’d recovered from his erection, he’d realize that his feelings for me weren’t shallow. Of course that didn’t happen.
If that’s how a woman is treated for being honorable then I shudder to think what women who apply the opposite have to deal with.
Perhaps my rant would carry more weight if us women weren’t partially responsible for how some of us are treated by men. We’ve made ourselves so accessible that men just don’t feel it necessary to work hard for our interest anymore. For some of them, being committed seems redundant. We’re just not worth it.
The media isn’t helping either (well, does it ever?). We’re made to feel emancipated for being promiscuous. Curse you, Sex and the City!
My concern is the inherent fear of the many women scorned, that the tale of “the good guy” might as well be fiction.
It’s becoming much harder for women to be involved with a man without having to compromise ourselves in some way; and because we are so desperate for acceptance and to be desired (desperate for anything that’s remotely close to affection, really), we give in to every subtle coercion by every hairy dick named Tom.
Perhaps love hasn’t become difficult to find because we ceased to demand it as a prerequisite. Perhaps it’s become difficult to find because we’ve stopped nurturing it within ourselves.
Check out Paballo's blog and follow her on Twitter.

Attacked with acid, because she said “no” to marriage


The Ryot U.S. recently published a photo gallery of Middle Eastern women who suffered acid attacks at the hands of former suitors whose marriage proposals they rejected.
These shocking incidents show that there is still a massive consent-issue when it comes to women and marriage. Some women choose not to get married. That is their right and should thus be respected.
I have a middle-aged aunt who is a gorgeous and strong woman; and still I would find myself asking: "But, why isn’t she married?". That is because everyone else in my family has already found their soulmate.
For a while I even saw my aunt as kind of tragic. But the truth, which I later learnt, is that a few years ago, she was about to get married.
At the last moment, she called off the wedding amidst Lobola negotiations; and her fiance took the news very maturely – even though this couldn’t have been easy for him.
Now imagine her in the shoes of these women attacked with acid, deciding not to tie the knot after all. Backing out, or simply choosing to remain single. It is chilling to think she would have been one of the acid burn survivors.
For me, this all boils down to the kind of men boys have been raised to become. For some men, they are raised to believe that they are entitled to have certain things; mainly because of their gender. This often includes the right to a wife. If they don’t get what is theirs, they feel disrespected. Then they hurt people.
In my Christian faith, we believe that a marriage should reflect Christ’s love for the church. This means that two people must love each other and have each other’s best interests at heart at all times.
A man must love his wife as he would himself. Which man, who has a healthy love for himself would pour acid on his own face?
If a man truly loves a woman, just like my aunt’s former fiancé did, he will respect her decision not to get married and find happiness with someone else.
What if those acid burn survivors said "yes"? To be honest, that question did cross my mind. Any marriage that is not based on mutual consent is unlikely to be a happy/loving marriage. It can be endured, but never happy.
I could never fathom what it must be like to choose between being free, yet mutilated; or stuck in an unhappy marriage without any external scars.
I commend these women for their courage and their choice under such harsh circumstances.
Many commentators on the story rightfully say that these 'boys' should be brutally punished. One of them even says that the acid "should be poured on their genitals."
Will even the most severe punishment, put a stop to this disgusting practice? After all, crimes such as domestic violence  still exist despite the strictest laws against it. I say, our hearts are the drawing board and that is where we need to go for any hope of change.

Animal rights activist compares lab Chimpanzees to African American slaves


An animal rights activist in his quest to grant primates the same liberties enjoyed by humans​​shockingly ​compared ​their legal fight to the struggle of enslaved blacks in the US.

Steve Wise the lawyer 'representing these chimpanzees, Hercules and Leo said:
“We had a history of that for hundreds of years saying black people are not part of society and you can enslave them. That wasn’t right. It didn’t work,” said Steven Wise, head of the Nonhuman Rights Project.

His group is asking a Manhattan Supreme Court judge to grant a writ of habeas corpus to two chimpanzees living in a Stony Brook University lab in Suffolk County. If granted, the writ would free the 8-year-old chimps Hercules and Leo by declaring their confinement illegal.

Wise came before Justice Barbara Jaffee after losing their fight in three other state courts.

He extended the slavery comparison by saying that at one point in time courts didn’t recognize Native Americans as “legal persons” either.

Wise said chimps are “autonomous beings…they are self-conscious…they can understand what others are thinking…they plan for what their life is going to be like…they have language they have mathematics, they have material and social culture. They are the kinds of beings who can remember the past and plan for the future.” In a human, argued Wise, those capacities are grounds for the right to be free. .

“Arbitrarily condemning an autonomous being to a life of slavery could eat away at the rights that we humans thought we had,” Wise claimed.

He went on to make the startling claim that locking up chimps “may be even worse than imprisoning human beings” because “they don’t even know why they’re there.”

The DA said animals don't have the same legal rights as humans hence the Judge should dismiss the case because they have another location for the chimps that is safe for them.

Win or lose, Wise said at a press conference following the trial, the hearing itself was a victory. “Many human beings have these kinds of hearings,” he said. Chimpanzees “are now being treated like all the other autonomous beings of this world.” Whether they’ll continue to get that treatment will be up to Justice Jaffe.